This article is directed at those ‘first responders’ who arrive immediately at the failure scene. These are the people who have to ensure the area is safe, preserve the scene for investigators and contribute to a plan to expedite a quick, safe return to production norms.
Many do not understand how valuable failed parts are to the metallurgical/forensic investigators. Broken parts are to metallurgists’, like the murder weapon is to a forensic crime investigator.
This article is meant to educate those that have access to the failed parts first, as to why they should preserve them in their failed state (not cleaning them up). We want to give them enough knowledge to be dangerous and raise their curiosity as to making a call on the fracture patterns they see.
Most all components fail for one, or a combination of, four (4) major physical reasons.
In Part I of this mini-series, we will explore Erosion and Corrosion. We will save Fatigue and Overload for Part II (in an effort to make the learning more digestible in smaller chunks:-).
When investigating failures involving components, their fracture surfaces will tell a story as to what happened to them. As you approach any such failure scene, try and visualize being that failed part and thinking to yourself, “What just happened to me?” Visualize the part being in operation and the forces affecting it. Seems kind of corny, but it is a very effective approach to understanding of what happened. Let’s explore the basics of these very involved failure patterns.
Erosion is caused by the presence of particles in the process medium contacting a surface and damaging it. Erosion can be delivered from fluid/air:
- Fluid/air contaminated (particles present)
- Fluid/air viscosity changed
- Fluid/air velocity changed
- Material eroding is wrong material for existing service
- Materials are not compatible
Erosion can be abrasive or adhesive. Here are some basic examples:
Corrosion is the deterioration of a material due to interaction with its environment. It is the process in which metallic atoms leave the metal or form compounds in the presence of water and gases. Metal atoms are removed from a structural element until it fails, or oxides build up inside a pipe until it is plugged. Corrosion is an electro-chemical process. Corrosion can be complicated. To identify that there is corrosion should be sufficient for novices. Further detailed analysis should be performed by a qualified professional.
The are several types of corrosion, such as:
- Uniform Attack
- Pitting Corrosion Attack
- Crevice Corrosion Attack
- Galvanic Corrosion Attack
- Erosion-Corrosion Attack
- Stress Corrosion Cracking
- Fretting Corrosion Attack
There are numerous variables that can create corrosion, here are some:
- Water quality
- Galvanic couples
- Material selection
- Effects of welding
- Startups and shutdowns
For the seasoned investigative veterans, this information will be old news (Investigation 101). However, the more the front-line folks in the field know these basics, the more they will be able to assist these veterans in their investigations. Proper investigations just cannot be comprehensive and thorough, without this physical evidence. So in the end, we are all helping out each other.
This will conclude Part I of our Component Failure Basics (2 of the 4 primary failure mechanisms). We will address the last ones (Fatigue and Overload) in Part II, in the coming weeks.
Please click the hyperlink if you’re interested in more job aides likes this and/or information on associated training and tools to help with understanding Why Parts Fail.
About the Author
Robert (Bob) J. Latino is CEO of Reliability Center, Inc. a company that helps teams and companies do RCAs with excellence. Bob has been facilitating RCA and FMEA analyses with his clientele around the world for over 35 years and has taught over 10,000 students in the PROACT® methodology.
Bob is co-author of numerous articles and has led seminars and workshops on FMEA, Opportunity Analysis and RCA, as well as co-designer of the award winning PROACT® Investigation Management Software solution. He has authored or co-authored six (6) books related to RCA and Reliability in both manufacturing and in healthcare and is a frequent speaker on the topic at domestic and international trade conferences.
Bob has applied the PROACT® methodology to a diverse set of problems and industries, including a published paper in the field of Counter Terrorism entitled, “The Application of PROACT® RCA to Terrorism/Counter Terrorism Related Events.”
What’s Wrong With The Term “Root Causes”?
The Stigma of RCA: What’s in a Name?
Is the 5-Ys a Valid RCA Tool for Significant Events?
RCA in Action: The Space Shuttle Columbia Investigation
Root Cause Analysis Software
Our RCA software mobilizes your team to complete standardized RCA’s while giving you the enterprise-wide data you need to increase asset performance and keep your team safe.