failure modes effects analysis opportunity analysis FMEA OA Information:

nEED sALES sHEET
nEED tRAINING sHEETS?

 

 

NEED TRAINING?
wE'VE GOT You COVERED!

“I had no idea how far trouble shooting might need to go. I didn’t know what I didn’t know. Thanks for the eye opening experience.”
Bruce Zachary,
PRIDE International

Failure Scene Investigation Techniques
“Enjoyed learning about fatigue & brittle analysis of failures.”
Chris Wylie, PRIDE International
Basic Failure Analysis
“I learned to look at problem solving in a different way.”
John Spiva, Mead Westvaco

 

Human Error Reduction Strategies
“I enjoyed the re-enactments and accident reviews from real situations.”
Dan Flinta, AES

 


 

Laying the Groundwork for your Reliability Success
The PROACT PERFORMANCE PROCESS [P3] MODEL

A Results Proven Process Available from Reliability Center, Inc.

When we commonly hear about Root Cause Analysis (RCA), we hear about it beingused to analyze a specific undesirable event that has occurred. Is there more to a successful RCA initiative than just solving one problem at a time? You bet there is! And RCI has the tools to prove it. Read on…

A successful RCA initiative requires organizational support within an organization's existing initiatives and company culture. RCI's P3 Model was specifically designed to show you how to get such support and also provides all the elements needed to lay the groundwork for your Reliability success.

In the interactive diagram below you will learn about all the components that exist in RCI's time tested and unique P3 Model. Each component provides a brief summary of its important role in the Reliability process. The P3 Model provides all the tools, skills and resources needed to elevate your organization to a performance level that most companies will never attain. It takes courage, belief and perseverance to discover your true Reliability potential! RCI has been helping Fortune 500 companies reach their Reliability business goals before Reliability was a "buzz" word like it is today. We know what we're talking about.

Oftentimes the reason for the inadequacy of any RCA effort will be attributed to the RCA approach that was utilized. In reality, the "root causes" of the RCA effort’s being unsuccessful will be embedded in organizational support system flaws. RCI's P3 Model is based on carefully researched data, results and experiences RCI has facilitated over the past 35 years. The P3 Model has demonstrated significant paybacks to organizations worldwide empowering them on their Reliability Journey.

Give us a call today and set your team on the right track! 804 458-0645

Mouse over the definition to see topics covered in class:

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Defining the Process:

The P3 Model focuses on the overall process needed for a successful RCA initiative. This model has also performed well under conditions where management support is minimal due to a reactive culture. The P3 Model is designed to provide maximum effectiveness in performing RCA. The model is made up of four parts:

1. Management Support
The first component is the management support needed for successful implementation of an RCA process.

2. PROACT Methodology
The second component is learning to use RCI's PROACT RCA method and the individual’s internal ability to use the method effectively. This is accomplished by giving the RCA analyst internal capabilities to read and interpret mechanical and electrical messages left behind in the failed parts (Reliability Physics) This piece of the RCA P3 model insures effective failure scene investigation.

3. Prioritization of Failure Candidates for RCA
The third component is designed to move toward a proactive approach of identifying the best candidates for RCA using Opportunity Analysis methods. The P3 Model identifies RCA candidates using focusing tools as opposed to triggers (Proactive Approach to Focus). By performing an Opportunity Analysis or “modified Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)”, RCA candidates can be identified and prioritized from most significant losses to least significant losses.

Many managers see human error as a problem that is only solved using disciplinary measures for corrective action. Human error can be managed much like a safe work environment can be managed. Procedures can be confusing to the reader by having instruction that needs interpretation by the reader such as, “turn valve B as needed”. This is considered a human error trap because the interpretation is left to the reader “As needed” can be interpreted differently by each individual reader. Another area where human pro-action can be utilized is within supervision. Many system roots identified have revealed supervision was not adequate, in some cases leaving the employee to guess what to do next or to cut corners in order to meet a perceived deadline, such as pressure to start up. This can cause a poor decision to occur.

4. Trending Results
The forth component of the model is Trending the analyses which reveals critical data where areas of Reliability improvements are suggested. Looking at areas that have a lot of bearing failures due to alignment issues may flag an RCA project for improvement. The trends produced from solid RCA analyses can raise a company’s facilities to an unprecedented level of Reliability.

The positive results of the P3 Model are dependent on the confidence of the analyst to perform the RCA method, knowing the roots will be uncovered and actions will be taken on recommendations. The support given by the analyst’s management is necessary for exceptional performance. The P3 Model training also offers (and suggests) additional mentoring support until team confidence is obtained independent of RCI. Our trainers and consultants want your team to succeed. It is our mission.

Contact:
Mark Latino, 804-458-0645 x303, mlatino@reliability.com or
Bob Latino 804-458-0645 x302, blatino@reliability.com
Mark and Bob will be happy to walk you through this results proven process. Contact them when you're ready to roll!