The following case studies are
a result of having the right combination of management support,
ideal RCA team and proper application of the RCA methodology.
RCI commends the submitters of these case histories for
their courage in allowing others to
learn from their experiences. These corporations and their
RCA efforts have proven what a well-focused organization
can accomplish with the creative and innovative minds of
their workforce.
As we read through
the summaries of these actual case histories, we will notice
that the Returns-On-Investment (ROI) for eliminating these
chronic events range from 3,100% to 17,900%. Had we not
had permission to publish these remarkable returns, “Would anyone have believed they were real”?
We will also notice that the time frames to complete the RCA’s
ranged from seven (7) days to eight (8)
months. While these results are without a doubt impressive,
they are easily attainable when the organizational environment
supports the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) activities. Read on
and become a believer. To learn how you can also obtain these
remarkable statistics we invite you to visit our PROACT® Suite page.
To
learn more details about the following
case histories and the method these
organizations used to succeed you can
purchase a copy of our third edition best seller titled Root
Cause Analysis: Improving Performance
for Bottom Line Results.
Many RCI case histories are described
in great detail in our book.
University of Michigan
Combined Cycle Congeneration Facility, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Event Summary:
A specific recurrence of
events resulted in several outages
to our heat-recovery steam generator
(HRSG) which, in turn, caused
the gas turbine (GT) to trip. For each
trip, the alarm would display a boiler
malfunction.
RCA Team Acknowledgements:
Principal Analyst:Mike Pepper
Title: Operations Supernatant
Company: University of Michigan Central Power Plant
Scope: Combined Cycle Congeneration Facility
Bottom-Line Results
The problem – outage was Gas turbine # 8 Trips. The CPP saved $100,000’s
dollars in getting back on line quickly and reduced the purchasing Electricity
from the Detroit Edison Power Grid.
Eastman Chemical Company
World Headquarters,
Kingsport, TN
Event Summary :
During 1997, Eastman Chemical senior management realized that their level of customer complaints had not shown significant reduction during the past few years. This was troubling, given that Eastman had a strong history of continually improvement performance in their processes. Furthermore, one of the key objectives of Eastman's Customer Complaint Handling Process was to investigate and identify the cause of complaints - evidently the complaint investigations were not as effective as expected.
RCA Team Acknowledgements:
Principal Analyst: Gary Hallen
Title: Customer Focus Manager
Company: Eastman Chemical Company
Scope: Global Customer Service Group
Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Baytank, Inc. for use of their RCA example (Figure 12.9). We admire their drive to conduct the RCA and their courage to let others learn from their success.
Bottom-Line Results
Elimination of half of Eastman's level of customer complaints. This equates to about $2,000,000 on reduced complaint handling costs, reduced waste and rework, and not losing customers due to poor quality.
Reduced operating and maintenance costs, from improved process and equipment reliability.
Event Summary :
The Thermo Compressor Cone on Paper Machine Number 3 was experiencing repeated failures due to cracking along a longitudinal weld. Replacement Thermo Compressor Cones lasted two months and two days, respectively, before new cracking appeared.
RCA Team Acknowledgements:
Principal Analyst: Ronald Hughes
Title: Senior Reliability Consultant
Company: Reliability Center Inc.
Site: Valliant, OK
Core RCA Team Members:
Douglas Dretzke
Matt Connolly
Steven Breaux
Theron Henry
Joel White
Freddy Rodriguez
Event Summary :
The Thermo Compressor Cone on Paper Machine Number 3 was experiencing repeated failures due to cracking along a longitudinal weld. Replacement Thermo Compressor Cones lasted two months and two days, respectively, before new cracking appeared.
RCA Team Acknowledgements:
Principal Analyst: Ronny Johnston
Title: Maintenance Planner
Company: Alabama Power
Site: Parrish, Alabama
Core RCA Team Members:
Paul Cooner
Chris Curow
Harold Dobbins
Steve Newton
David Hosmer
Bottom-Line Results
The wrong bearing was found to be used as a replacement for the original bearing
The impeller shaft run out was found to be not centered and in need of a spacer
The correct bearing was installed and CMMS data was upgraded to reflect it.
A spacer was installed and training was given to mechanics to help with proper alignment in the future.
RCA Team Statistics
Estimated Cost to Conduct RCA: $25,816.25
Estimated Return from RCA: The pump has not failed since the RCA saving rebuild costs like the five done the previous six months.
Return on Investment: ~3125%
Event Summary :
During a routine slag wash, the operator in the pulpit (control room) was raising the 11-ton lance carriage. While raising the lance to its idle position approximately 80' above the fourth floor, a coupling on the drive platform failed, sending the lance carriage into a free fall. The carriage broke through the stop bolts and crashed into the 4th floor.
RCA Team Statistics Start Date: November 16, 1996 End Date: June 26, 1997 Estimated Cost to Conduct RCA: $30,000 Estimated Returns from RCA: $1,150,000 Return On Investment:~4000%
Eastman Chemical Company
World Headquarters,
Kingsport, TN
Event Summary :
Five (5) similar customer complaints were received concerning green pellets mixed with clear pellets. Complaints were received from more than one customer, but not all rail cars of product received a complaint.
The silos and conveying systems were checked prior to their initial use for the clear product. They were also cleaned and inspected after each customer complaint. Each time, one or more potential sources of green contamination was found and corrected.
After the fifth complaint, a team was put together to discover and eliminate the Root Cause of the contamination.
RCA Team Statistics
Start Date: July 14, 1998
End Date: July 21, 1998
Estimated Cost to Conduct RCA: $2,700
Estimated Returns from RCA: $85,000
Return On Investment: ~3200%
Event Summary :
Recurrent failures of vacuum column bottom pumps. Both pumps came on-line in December 1996. The Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) was very poor at three (3) months. Failures of mechanical seals, thrust bearings, impellers and case wear rings were very common.
Most of the failures occurred at start-up. The system operates with one pump as a primary pump and the other as a spare pump. Different attempts to correct the above problems failed. There was not a good understanding of the causes of these failures and most important how they correlated to each other. At times, both pumps would not be available. The impact on production and the excessive maintenance costs resulted in management appointing a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) team to find and implement final solutions to these problems.
RCA Team Statistics
Start Date: August 4, 1997
End Date: September 26, 1997
Estimated Cost to Conduct RCA: $40,000
Estimated Returns from RCA: $7,150,000
Return On Investment: ~17,900%
Special Note of Thanks RCI would like to sincerely thank all the companies
mentioned below for allowing RCI to publish their successes.
RCI respects client confidentiality and will only use information
with special permission. Our reliability methods are saving
companies millions of dollars but many of our client's company
policies does not allow them to disclose this type of information.
PROACT® Suite
for Industry - Software Training Overview
I-Presentations
Reliability
Articles
Reliability
Links
Hotel Recommendations
Virginia Tourism
- Transportation
*New
Product Announcement
PROACT® Lead
Investigator Series In response to customer demand,
Reliability Center, Inc. (RCI) has designed
their newest training product. Their NEW PROACT Lead Investigator
Series will provide candidates solid foundations in the mechanical
reliability (fractology), electrical
reliability and an in-depth understanding about the conditions
that increase the risk of human error in the workplace.
Post,
Respond, Read and Learn...
Ask your representative to be included
in our discussions. Topics include; software support,
learning support, general comments and knowledge base.
Reliability
Consultants work as strategic partners so you can increase
precision, productivity
and profitability.
Reliability Center
Incorporated 501 Westover Avenue Hopewell, Virginia 23860 Phone:
804.458.0645 Fax: 804.452.2119 Email: Info@Reliability.com